In association with Marketing
Decarbonising the Brand

Carbon Footprint of marketing

How to measure the carbon footprint of your marketing

Carbon Footprint of marketing

From packaging to advertising, there are many aspects of marketing campaigns that can influence a product’s carbon footprint. The shift from print to electronic communication has reduced the industry’s paper demands, but there is still a black mark against some brands’ excessive use of packaging and direct mail.

Euan Murray, general manager of carbon footprinting at The Carbon Trust, says: ‘The marketer has an incredibly important role. Making sure that campaigns they run are efficient is incredibly important.

‘The trend that is starting to emerge is a shift away from physical media to electronic. If marketers can avoid printing something by sending consumers an email, that makes sense.’

The medium that attracts most criticism in this area is direct mail, which is seen by some consumer groups as wasteful and unwelcome. Total spend on direct mail for the year ending June 2009 was down 9.9% year–on–year, according to figures from Nielsen Media Research as brands continue to switch their direct mail budgets into areas such as e–mail.

The biggest users of direct mail, according to Nielsen, are BSkyB, BT and MBNA Bank. The industry has got better at personalisation, cutting down on wastage, and it remains an effective customer acquisition tool for brands in sectors such as financial services, insurance and direct–to–consumer retail.

Murray advocates regular review of mailing lists: ‘Managing the spurious use of paper is important. It makes sense because your data and postage costs are lower. It is about being as targeted as you can.’

The use of the internet in marketing campaigns is expected to continue to rise, as we spend more of our lives in the web. In the first half of 2009 internet advertising weathered the recession and grew by 4.6% to £1.7bn, overtaking TV for the first time.

But while the web is a relatively new phenomenon, the subject of excessive packaging has angered green lobbyists for years.

Some brands have upped their game by using recyclable materials and encouraging consumers to refill old bottles, for example. But in competitive markets, such as fmcg, where brands can live and die on their in–store presence, packaging needs to be eye–catching, so there is a tension between sales and sustainability.

Murray says criticism is understandable, but products must be appropriately packaged to ensure they reach the buyer in the best condition. ‘There is a risk that the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater. We all need to recognise the important role that packaging plays. It makes sure that the product gets to the customer in decent working order.’

As sustainability rises up the consumer agenda, waste will become the watchword by which products are judged. Any brand seen to be using unnecessary levels of paper or packaging may find themselves joining them in the dustbin.

Comment from David Busbridge

Time: June 18, 2010, 03:10

One way to make sure you are making less of an impact is to only use companies that are ISO14001 Approved - www.avalonprint.com being one of them. When you find out just what can be achieved with regard to lessening the environmental impact it's amazing.

Comment from Andrew Mills

Time: April 14, 2010, 01:17

Reduce the amount of unwanted marketing mail by only sending e-communications that Customers want. For centuries businesses have used the village business marketing concept. That is, set up a business, put up a sign and tried telling everyone in the village what they do. This was a fine marketing strategy for a village business, but not a business for a global village. One simple solution is to turn marketing upside down, by using the AltruWorld system, (http://www.altruworld.com) which empowers and gives more control to Customers and Suppliers, whilst drastically reducing the carbon footprint and reducing suppliers typical marketing cost by 38% - 97%. PS: Like Dan Matthews, I found this article because I was interested in how to measure a companies carbon footprint of your marketing.

Comment from Tim Craig

Time: April 06, 2010, 05:30

Returned, unwanted and undelivered mail produces vast amounts of waste paper and 80% of the carbon footprint for direct mail pieces lies in the ‘end of life’ solution. PAS2020, Royal Mail’s Sustainable Mail and the EU Directives on Landfill all require that the waste paper generated by returned mail is disposed of correctly. We provide a proven, specialist, automated and quick turn around service for processing Returned and Undelivered Mail from anywhere in the UK and we undertake the destruction and recycling of all the waste paper. www.veri-data.co.uk

Comment from tim garbutt

Time: March 12, 2010, 02:06

There are many ways to reduce the carbon footprint of your marketing: energy supplies, building maintenance, supplier contracts - for more info see www.sincerityagency.com as these measures are the next stage in connecting to a brand's consumers.

Comment from Ann McLaughlin

Time: February 24, 2010, 01:39

Whilst it is laudable for marketers to consider switching away from traditional printed communications to digital channels, there seems little consideration of the environmental impact of the power required to transmit emails and the impact of individuals printing out marketing emails they receive. Using a desktop printer isn't as efficient as mass production.

Comment from Dan Matthews

Time: January 04, 2010, 02:39

This article is titled how to measure the carbon footprint of your marketing. This is of great interest to me and I'm sure others. However, the article doesn't tell you anything about how to measure a companies carbon footprint through marketing.

Name:
E-mail:
Your comment:
Haymarket Logo

Haymarket © 1957 – 2009