In association with Marketing
Decarbonising the Brand

Green talk vs Action

Green consumers exaggerate their credentials

Green talk Vs Action

Although consumers say they are green, they are still confused about product labelling and often fail to act upon their stated principles. –when the reality can be somewhat different.

Of the 6,000 shoppers interviewed in Deloitte/GMA’s 2009 study ‘Finding the Green in Today’s Shopper’, 95% said they ‘would buy green’ but only 75% said they ‘know what a green product is’.

Furthermore, just 63% admitted they were ‘looking for green’ when shopping, and only 47% said they ‘saw green products’. Ultimately, just 22% of respondents said they ‘bought green’ in the surveyed shopping experience.

The study concluded that there is a large opportunity for companies to fulfil this latent demand for green products.
So, for example, while consumers might want to choose a product that has a low carbon footprint, they may not fully understand how to recognise it from the packaging and other marketing that they encounter.

The challenge for marketers of ‘green’ brands is to ensure that their products are clearly signposted and visible to shoppers. Euan Murray, general manager, carbon footprinting at The Carbon Trust, says it is understandable that people over–state their green intentions. ‘It is human nature to want to look as good as you can,’ he says.

‘The reality is that we have got to make it easier for people. That is about information and having the right systems in place.’ While consumers might ideally want to buy green products, this may be only one of many influences that they consider when shopping, including price, availability and perceived quality.

The Deloitte/GMA study found that: ‘A significant minority of committed and proactive green shoppers are willing to pay more for green products, however, the larger potential population of shoppers that lean towards green want price and performance parity for sustainable products because it is not their dominant purchase driver.’

Murray says that brands must explain concisely and clearly why a product’s green credentials make it worthy of purchase, as the demand is there for the companies that communicate it well.

‘There is a latent demand out there. People say they recognise climate change is a problem and they want to do the right thing. 70% tell us that they want more help from companies to do the right thing,’ he explains ‘Where that gap exists between rhetoric and reality is where companies aren’t clear about what they want people to do.’

Comment from tim garbutt

Time: March 12, 2010, 02:12

The main issue here is the dearth of green options: only 22% were able to buy green even if they wanted to. While the slow pace of government reform on issues such as renewable energy and labelling prevents those latecomers to market from having a wider and informed choice. Is the Carbon Trust in danger of becoming another talking shop and "survey mill" within government?

Comment from chris Arnold

Time: December 11, 2009, 05:26

I'm surprised that 95% said they'd buy green, even given the amount of government campaigning and media coverage - I wonder if this was conducted outside Planet Organic. Our own shoppers survey was less optimistic but then consumers probably like to nod to what they think is the right answer rather then the honest answer. The big issue is, what do they understand is green? Does it include ethical products like Fairtrade? Various research shows that Fairtrade ways out does environmental issues - there's a complex explanation why. The other issue is, do shoppers say one thing and do another? Certainly. In one survey over 70% said they'd buy Fairtrade against 17% that actually did. I think consumers want to do the right thing for people and the planet sure but they are also cynical due to the number of green lies and greenwash.

Name:
E-mail:
Your comment:
Haymarket Logo

Haymarket © 1957 – 2009